qwe
8/13/15
4/19/12
Propaganda Poster Rebuttals
Did you know?
REBUTTAL
The original Constitution of the united states that was ratified in 1789 had only one reference to religion: [Article 6] No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Did You Know?
THAT to take the "Original Constitution of 1789" is to CENSOR THE BILL OF RIGHTS! [1791], for which the only argument against at the time was FEAR that including A Provision of assured limitations may imply otherwise unlimitation on Federal Government's Power!
Federalist 84
bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?
Think in that frame of mind when you consider modern
stifling of Public Prayer, Religious Memorial desecration, and banning
religious discussion and the very Bible from schools, by GOVT.
The de facto motto of the United States, adopted as part of the Great Seal of the U.S. by an Act of Congress in 1782 was E. Plurivus Unum (Out of Many, One). Congress changed it 174 years later (1956) to "In God We Trust"
DID YOU KNOW!? THAT on the reverse side of the Great Seal is a Symbol for God's Providence, an 'All Seeing eye' and an unfinished pyramid.
INSCRIBED WITH!
INSCRIBED WITH!
"Annuit cœptis" - Annuit "to nod" or "to approve", and coeptis, "commencement, undertaking" it is literally translated, "He approves (has approved) of the undertakings"
and
"Novus ordo seclorum" - "New Order of the Ages"
"Novus ordo seclorum" - "New Order of the Ages"
The original 'Pledge of Allegiance' was written in 1892 by Baptist Minister Francis Bellamy who DID NOT INCLUDE the words "Under God." Those were added by Congress 62 years later (1954).
DID YOU KNOW!? THAT
the original pledge of allegiance came with an outstretched arm salute
exactly like the "HEIL HITLER" salute. [If I wanted to play their little
game, I could suggest that maybe they'd like to revert to that
tradition along with the erasure of "Under God"].
The U.S. didn't issue Paper Currency until 1861, and 'In God We Trust' didn't appear on it for 96 years (1957).
DID YOU KNOW!? THAT
few coins were minted in the thirteen colonies that became the United
States in 1776, foreign coins like the Spanish dollar were widely
circulated. Colonial governments sometimes issued paper money to
facilitate economic activity, but Commodities such as tobacco, beaver
skins, and wampum served as money at various times and places. Because
the framers of the Constitution sought to limit the issuance of
currency, they explicitly prohibited the states from issuing bills of
credit. British colonies in North America would issue bills of credit in
order to deal with financial crises, although doing so repeatedly would
result in inflation. The documents would circulate as if they were
currency, and colonial governments would accept them as payment for
debts like taxes. They were not always considered legal tender for
private debts. The preceding 'motto' for coinage was "Mind your
business".
It seems an oversight of the author of this polemic that they should not mention any coinage or pre-United States bills and what they did or did not have on them.
It seems an oversight of the author of this polemic that they should not mention any coinage or pre-United States bills and what they did or did not have on them.
Just after the Red Scare in the 1950's, CONGRESS CHANGED the Pledge of Allegiance and our Nation's Motto over the FEAR of COMMUNISM.
DID YOU KNOW!? THAT the red scare should have been received as much scarier, not only for widely corrupt methods used by Sen. McCarthy, but the innumerable REAL communists that had infiltrated media and govt.
In a time when fear is traded like a commodity, and the word SOCIALISM is being used to create the same fear as the old word COMMUNISM, let's REMEMBER that our country was NOT founded on fear. NO, OUR NATION was founded out of HOPE for a better world where all people were equal, - that we were ONE from MANNY.
DID YOU KNOW!? THAT "Ad Hominem" is Latin, meaning appeal to emotion
rather than reason.and that socialism and communism aren't just
emotionally received words, but political and economic philosophies
which as defined by the so called Scare Mongers, can be demonstrably
shone to have been implemented in the US today. Socialism is the
Collective [thru government] ownership or control [regulation] of
segments of the economy. A loose definition of Communism or Marxism goes
by quote from Karl himself "From Each According To His Ability to Each
According to His Need", by this we describe REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH, as
Marxist.
Let's not let fear change our nation's great tradition and direction again.
LETS NOT FEAR WORDS, BUT HAVE THE COURAGE TO DEFINE WHAT THEY MEAN AND STAND FOR THE TRUTH IN THE FACE OF EVIL and WANTON DECEPTION.
[ http://asderathos.tumblr.com/post/11764890756/did-you-know-that-to-take-the-original ]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust
Marx: I told you I was right REBUTTAL:
LMAO!!!~ mno
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Glenn Beck, The New McCarthyism REBUTTAL:http://asderathos.tumblr.com/post/10227676589/andrew-mccarthy-a-senator-who-used-his
Andrew McCarthy, A Senator who used his GOVERNMENTAL authority to hold hearings questioning people esp. those in govt or entertainment, as to their loyalty & possible affiliation with the Communist Party a Known accomplice to an enemy of the United States, The USSR. There were many many communists in the US engaged in very subversive actions, particularly Hollywood & Govt.; however the disreputable methods in 'finding guilt' cast an ever widening net hauling in the innocent with the 'guilty'. The "Red Scare" should have scared the crap out of you in more ways than one; both in that there were so many ACTUAL COMMUNISTS in the US & how our representatives were dealing with it.
Glenn Beck, Talk Show Host, has shown people, esp. in government, saying things in their own words, then questioning if they said this then, when was their 'come to Jesus moment' where they suddenly become capitalists? & if they haven't had one [as either the question was ignored, or the comments were dismissed as jokes in spite of plane policy] how have they been able to get into govt.? and what is their agenda!? Beck's are more the actions of a JOURNALIST [not that he's ever claimed to be one, although he's read Walter Lippmann...].
I might remind you that there were no witches in Salem [or Europe, where they lasted a LOT longer], just psychotropic ergot poisoning. There WERE Communists in US Govt. & Hollywood, not that it excuses the methods.
"By August, I was a communist." -Van Jones
Beck never called for Self Avowed Communist Van Jones to be fired, much less imprisoned.
Jones being 'Green Jobs Czar': Green Jobs being encouraged by anything but the free market is itself Anti-Capitalist!
Obama was raised by Communists, mother, father, step father, & grand parents, his mentor Communist-Poet Frank Marshal Davis was the one who convinced Obama to go to Chicago.
Obama In his own words
"To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists, and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neoclonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarcy, " -Dreams From My Father
Need I list Obama's record as Prez? A Not so Trojan Horse [defined as Single Payer by its author] "Obama-Care", The Keynesian Stimulus, The Financial Bill institutionalizing "Too Big To Fail" [FYI BAILOUTS ARE SOCIALISM], Obama's "Rural Council" the agenda 21 nightmare of regulation, & The Current "Jobs Bill" IE 2nd 'stimulus' of around 1 Trillion dollars.
If he's a capitalist, I'm a giraffe.
http://asderathos.tumblr.com/post/14321891546/asderathos-white-privilege-is-a-myth-propagated
White privilege is a myth propagated long after its death; reborn of the violent ignorance of racism among non-whites; combined with an assumption that the majority of the majority [‘whites’] hold interest in, and authority to, suppress ppl for their skin color.
It is a racial scapegoating belligerently ignorant of the quantifiable and common discrepancies between levels of success which coincide with certain cultures and values held transcending race.
The UNCONSTITUTIONAL law, today, demands Racial preference for non-whites.
LMAO, Its hilarious that leftists are so indoctrinated that they think they have ANY ‘Facts’. But its sad that leftists don’t recognize the necessity of applying VALUES. And its sickening that leftists are so pathetically ignorant as to believe the bile spewed about Glenn without even checking what he actually says.
No questions, Only statements.
NATIONALISM
a term of disparate meaning.
There is National-Socialism/Fascism, which when materially compared with International-Socialism/Communism, both are shown to be nothing more than Imperial Fascism with a difference of Capitols.
There is Patriotic Nationalism of varying meaning for more than the number of countries on the planet.
There is Hitler’s “Unpatriotic Nationalism” which is ethno-racial.
There is the simple belief in having a Nation-State juxtaposed to an international governance, Nation states having definitive borders, a common language, and set of philosophies cultural civic and social.
There can be no comparison what-so-ever between the Aryan pan German Racial Totalitarian Collectivist ethos with American Melting Pot MultiEthnic ethos of Inclusion based upon ideals of individual freedom. [you pathetically ignorant scumbag]
AUTHORITARIANISM
The tea parties by its very nature is against high taxes, and the large size of government. that is definitively their message and it has nothing to do with authoritarianism but in that it is completely against it.
SOCIAL DARWINISM
Economically this term refers to "The Market Picking Winners And Losers" Hitler's Germany specifically "Picked Winners & Losers". It might also infer the lack of charity whereas the Tea Parties is pro-charity.
Eugenics is the non-econo-centric meaning which has no association of promotion from the Tea Parties, but rather the American Far Left, historically.
INDOCTRINATION
Is the coerced belief in a specific dogma, to the exclusion of hearing alternative evidence. The tea party itself is not one organization but a movement of disparate organizations only associated by broad ideals [of lower taxes & smaller govt.] and name. The Hitler youth is no comparison. This propganda poster however is 'indoctrination' as it is a slanderous lie about the opposition aimed at denying even the exploration of dissenting beliefs, by comparison to Nazism; Godwin's law anyone?
ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM
The tea parties only rejects the system of a centrally planned economy and society by so called 'intellectuals', IE authoritarianism of the "Philip Dru Administration" model, which is the antithesis of freedom.
Hitler's was a Hoover-esque, "Rationalized" planning model, akin to FDR's experimentations, that is do what worked with no allegiance to political dogma.
The Tea Parties only political dogma is "Smaller Government, Lower Taxes".
MILITARISM
The Tea Parties have never been about war one way or another, solely stitched together by the broad based principles of Smaller Govt. Lower Taxes.
The Nazis were Imperialistic in that they wished to spread their racial eugenics and Centrally Planned Socialism across the globe.
The various stances for and against US Military Policy within the Tea Parties are utterly incomparable.
ANTI-COMMUNISM
You know who else is anti-communist? Free Marketeers, Merchantalists, every non communist that there is in the world, and lady bugs. Communism is the economically the most FAIL system ever devised in the world, for man's freedom and his LIFE. Every advocate for an economic system with codified property rights is against the destruction of property rights IE Communism.
As for the implied "McCarthyism" BS: There were many many communists in the US engaged in very subversive actions, particularly Hollywood & Govt.; however the disreputable methods in ‘finding guilt’ cast an ever widening net hauling in the innocent with the ‘guilty’. The “Red Scare” should have scared the crap out of you in more ways than one; both in that there were so many ACTUAL COMMUNISTS in the US & how our representatives were dealing with it.
As defined as "Forced redistribution of wealth with a hostility towards individual property under the guise of charity and or justice."??? We already have terms for voluntary giving and equal protection under the law, which are"Charity" and "Civic Equality", both being the antithesis of Governmental Redistribution and the Unequal Preference promoted today as "Social Justice".
The term seems to have once held the opposite meaning which can explain some of the confusion today. But plz stop calling Jesus a Socialist out of complete ignorance.
7/4/11
The Heart, deceitful? Wicked beyond cure? hmmm
Jeremiah 17:9 warns: "The heart is deceitful above all things and beyond cure. Who can understand it?"
I saw this most recently in a clip of Billy Graham's sermon, which seemed to take the road of "shaming into piety", which didn't resonate with me at all.
I've often questioned the various versions of this passage with the "Desparately Wicked"'s and "Exceedingly Corrupt"'s http://bible.cc/jeremiah/17-9.htm
but in Clarke's commentary, the completeness of the translation is questioned:
" אנש anash is never used in Scripture to denote wickedness of any kind. My old MS. Bible translates thus: - Schrewid is the herte of a man: and unserchable: who schal knowen it?"
Recognizing a peculiar aspect of western culture: that [the Adventurous and ideal] "Romanticism" grew into the modern "Romance" [that means emotional relations], while retaining associations with the human heart; it seems to me this has changed our perception of it.
My being less the Hebrew scholar than even Martin Luther [who admitted he knew nothing of the grammar], I cannot be remotely sure that this idea of mine is sound. But I think this Jeremiah verse, modernly is taken too far to condemn 'man's heart'. It seems to me the older meaning of "The Human Heart" was not at all synonomous with love or tenderness or compassion; but of hot blood, rashness, and perhaps even anger and pride.
My education is far to scarce on these matters to be sure; but that's why I can't nail down a theology for myself.
I saw this most recently in a clip of Billy Graham's sermon, which seemed to take the road of "shaming into piety", which didn't resonate with me at all.
I've often questioned the various versions of this passage with the "Desparately Wicked"'s and "Exceedingly Corrupt"'s http://bible.cc/jeremiah/17-9.htm
but in Clarke's commentary, the completeness of the translation is questioned:
" אנש anash is never used in Scripture to denote wickedness of any kind. My old MS. Bible translates thus: - Schrewid is the herte of a man: and unserchable: who schal knowen it?"
Recognizing a peculiar aspect of western culture: that [the Adventurous and ideal] "Romanticism" grew into the modern "Romance" [that means emotional relations], while retaining associations with the human heart; it seems to me this has changed our perception of it.
My being less the Hebrew scholar than even Martin Luther [who admitted he knew nothing of the grammar], I cannot be remotely sure that this idea of mine is sound. But I think this Jeremiah verse, modernly is taken too far to condemn 'man's heart'. It seems to me the older meaning of "The Human Heart" was not at all synonomous with love or tenderness or compassion; but of hot blood, rashness, and perhaps even anger and pride.
My education is far to scarce on these matters to be sure; but that's why I can't nail down a theology for myself.
7/1/11
Easy Equality sacrificed for Impossible Acceptance
Marriage being and always having been between a man and a woman culturally, religiously, legally: the SANE method for EQUALITY FOR ALL, and not just homosexuals; is the legality of “Civil Union” contracts with all the privileges as a Marriage Contract. Either by simple standardization, under separate titles, [to which no human in the nation objects], or the replacement of govt. issued “Marriage” with civil union contracts.
The only thing preventing equality under the law, is the belligerent culture that demands accepting a moral sameness which AINT NEVER GONNA HAPPEN, under the guise of ’equality’. This culture [demanding moral acceptance] is a sickness born ironically from the psychotic belief that “gender is socially constructed” [seeing as the condemnation of having a moral judgment upon the behavior, requires a belief that one is “born that way”].
—
You don’t have to agree with my reasoning, but if your reaction to it, is a personal attack on me, [IE you’re a “Homo-phobe” or “Hatemonger”] check yourself, your missing your critical thinking, maybe it dribbled out your ears when you weren’t looking.
—
Yes, you can reject the moral relativism while still embracing sexual libertariandism; You deserve equality and freedom, but that doesn’t mean I don’t get to judge you [as in have an opinion not mortally or legally condemn] for your choices & behavior.
June282011
The only thing preventing equality under the law, is the belligerent culture that demands accepting a moral sameness which AINT NEVER GONNA HAPPEN, under the guise of ’equality’. This culture [demanding moral acceptance] is a sickness born ironically from the psychotic belief that “gender is socially constructed” [seeing as the condemnation of having a moral judgment upon the behavior, requires a belief that one is “born that way”].
—
You don’t have to agree with my reasoning, but if your reaction to it, is a personal attack on me, [IE you’re a “Homo-phobe” or “Hatemonger”] check yourself, your missing your critical thinking, maybe it dribbled out your ears when you weren’t looking.
—
Yes, you can reject the moral relativism while still embracing sexual libertariandism; You deserve equality and freedom, but that doesn’t mean I don’t get to judge you [as in have an opinion not mortally or legally condemn] for your choices & behavior.
June282011
Unthoughtful Argument 2nd draft
Some people like to describe abortion, solely as “a woman’s right to choose. Others espouse the equality of unborn children, male or female, in their “right to life”. The term ‘murder’ by definition refers solely to death caused by choice. In fact the Biblical Commandment translates more accurately “thou shalt not murder”.
In triage situations, that is the prioritizing of patients, the doctor is not held legally responsible for what may otherwise have been medical neglect. Thus in the rare cases where abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother, none would espouse the doctor’s being held legally responsible for “Murder”.
I have always espoused the relinquishing of the legal issue of abortion [as to the sacrosanct threshold of HUMAN Life] from federal to “state-by-state” jurisdiction. The promotion of so-called-abortion for three year olds, demonstrates the madness present on the fringes of academia.
For a comical allegory of the generally “to crazy to argue with” situation see this link. I find it quite applicable to any who would espouse late term or partial birth abortion, accepting triage of course.
It should be troubling to everyone, that the proliferation of birth control & abortion originated with Margaret Sanger & her “Planned Parenthood” group. Sanger who was a racist, that promoted birth control among “socially undesirable people” aka nonwhites, first openly, as a racially motivated ‘soft-genocide’ & after a trip to Europe she promoted birth control among the black communities for “social reasons”.
“[the] most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it.” -Margaret Sanger
June272011
In triage situations, that is the prioritizing of patients, the doctor is not held legally responsible for what may otherwise have been medical neglect. Thus in the rare cases where abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother, none would espouse the doctor’s being held legally responsible for “Murder”.
I have always espoused the relinquishing of the legal issue of abortion [as to the sacrosanct threshold of HUMAN Life] from federal to “state-by-state” jurisdiction. The promotion of so-called-abortion for three year olds, demonstrates the madness present on the fringes of academia.
For a comical allegory of the generally “to crazy to argue with” situation see this link. I find it quite applicable to any who would espouse late term or partial birth abortion, accepting triage of course.
It should be troubling to everyone, that the proliferation of birth control & abortion originated with Margaret Sanger & her “Planned Parenthood” group. Sanger who was a racist, that promoted birth control among “socially undesirable people” aka nonwhites, first openly, as a racially motivated ‘soft-genocide’ & after a trip to Europe she promoted birth control among the black communities for “social reasons”.
“[the] most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it.” -Margaret Sanger
June272011
2/23/11
Egyptian Revolution
The Jerusalem Post -
"There is one easily missed word in the speech that is most significant, the word 'hypocrites.' In the Islamic lexicon, 'hypocrites' means Muslims who do not practice true Islam according to the radicals. To take Egypt out of hands of hypocrites is to put it in the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood or at least similarly minded people which contrary to the best and brightest policymakers, intelligence analysts, experts and journalists is not a moderate organization."
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/glenn-beck/transcript/beck-where-will-middle-east-dominoes-fall
______________________________________________________________________________________________
My Youtube Playlist defining the Egyptian Revolution - http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FC14F08615468F4D
-Just some points to remember-
The Muslim Brotherhood Or "Ikhwan"
The Brotherhood claims not to be seeking "Political Power" but they do not need The 'Presidency' [as they defined 'political power thereby], freedom of influence is all they need to grow their cause.
The Brotherhood's slogan is- "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Quran is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope."
An Explanatory Memorandum On the General Strategic Goal for the Group In North America 5/22/1991 - http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/20.pdf
The Brotherhoood had its hands in the so-called "Freedom Flotilla" [along with code pink] - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dE2StbDL_Q&p=ABE4C6D637D37FEE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUOeBWDJfR0&p=ABE4C6D637D37FEE
The Brotherhood created the Terrorist organization "Hamas" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzK114-Q8zg&p=ABE4C6D637D37FEE
The Brotherhood helped organize the Egyptian Riots/Protests which from day to day ranged wildly from as peaceful as anyone could ask, Christians watching over Muslims as they prayed & Muslims Defending Christians- to blood in the streats, lynchings & medieval warfare against between Protestors & Pro-Mubarak, [allegedly paid] 'counter-protestors'.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Dead Wrong: Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood Demands Sharia Slavery
by Paul Cooper April 23 2011
http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/04/23/dead-wrong-egyptian-muslim-brotherhood-demands-sharia-slavery/
the Muslim Brotherhood has finally admitted they are aiming to bring violent extremes of Sharia to the people of Egypt and a sure destruction to relations with Israel.
The independent news source Al-Masry al-Youm reported last week that Muslim Brotherhood leaders have finally admitted to wanting Egyptian government to be based on Sharia law:
Mahmoud Ezzat, the Muslim Brotherhood’s deputy Supreme Guide, said in a forum held in the Cairo district of Imbaba on Thursday that the group wants to establish an Islamic state after it achieves widespread popularity through its Freedom and Justice Party. Meanwhile, Brotherhood leader Saad al-Husseiny, said at the forum that the group aims to apply Islamic legislation and establish Islamic rule.The reaction by moderates and Coptic Christians is near panic. Even some of them had been convinced or at least hoped that the Brotherhood had changed its ways. With these recent revelations, Christian groups in Cairo are canceling Easter service invitations to Brotherhood members. Abdel Maseeh Baseet, the pastor of the Church of Saint Marie in Mostorod, Egypt said we now know the true plans of the Brotherhood and it’s time for the rest of us to realize it:
This way of thinking is rejected both locally and internationally. The world is not ready for a Taliban-style state.---
the rest is omfg territory
---
__________________________________________________________________________________
May 02, 2011
Are Democratic Elections Feasible in the Middle East?
By Robert Weissberghttp://www.americanthinker.com/2011/05/are_democratic_elections_feasi.html
Americans are hopelessly infatuated with "democracy" and relentlessly try to export it. The recent "Arab Spring" testifies to the seductive power of our proselytizing. Protestors often demand "freedom and democracy" but mesmerizing slogans aside, why is "democracy" so valuable or what it does it mean to those risking life and limb for it? The hard truth is that tribalism prone Arab nations will not become democratic. Democracy cannot be commanded into existence; it requires a complex culture to flourish and that culture is in short supply in today's Middle East.
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Senior Ikwhan Member seeks Egyptian Presidency - http://www.theblaze.com/stories/glenns-crazy-conspiracy-senior-member-of-egypt%E2%80%99s-muslim-brotherhood-seeks-egypt-presidency-2/
2/15/11
Musings
Christianity is the philosophy of love. Christianity teaches "Christian Love" aka 'agape' [selfless love].
The etymology of the word 'philosophy' is philo- "loving" + sophia "knowledge, wisdom,".
The etymology of the word 'Christianity/Christ' is "anointed" from Gk. khristos "the anointed", translation of Heb. mashiah/messiah "anointed" [syn. blessed]
-so 'The Philosophy of Selfless Love' is "The Love of [belief in] The Wisdom of Selfless Love"
The L. term 'drove out' O.E. hæland "healer" ["make whole, sound and well,"] as the preferred descriptive term for Jesus.
An embrace of Christian Morality heals individuals by their own selflessness.
God's poetic machine, the universe.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Meaning being self-apparent; God is good, and the good in life is god's purpose; creation its vessel.
__________________________________________________________________________________
The purpose of life being life, synonymous with equitably mutual freedom by natural law, [its moral incarnation the Golden Rule] the right of property ownership beyond subsistence reaped from effort sewn is an extension of self ownership, intrinsic to life/freedom.
__________________________________________________________________________________
1/30/11
01-30-11 Explaining Capitalism Again
There is not, and can never be, any such thing as a purely economic, or purely governmental system to the total exclusion of one from the other. Any Governmental structure whatever its form, must be funded. The Market itself must bare confidence in security of exchange in order to be free. Where traditional “Government” does not operate, the ‘government’ of martial force comes to bare as a chief consideration upon all individuals. [Governments being instituted among men to secure their Creator endowed, unalienable rights, Life Liberty, and Property being among them]
Of course the imperfection of every form of Government known to man cannot negate the positive gain in secured trade. In a ‘State of Nature’ absent even the most primitive social contract, the market would be limited by the confidence of the participants. Where would voluntary exchange seem more secure, between hermits in a wilderness, or citizens of a governmental body which provides a police force?
For a “Market” to be “Free” its government must secure the rights of individuals to keep or sell their labor and property as they see fit [a minimal infringement/taxation required to fund that security].
Only “Anti-Capitalists” argue that “Capitalism” is not synonymous with a “Free Market System”, although many Anti-Capitalists would make no distinction while embracing the Marxian pejoratives which violate the principles of Economic Freedom.
All “Anti-Capitalist” systems, most of which brand themselves “Socialist” or “Communist” bare the unifying traits of infringing and violating the paradoxical principle of Maximum Property Rights and Limited/Minimal Government.
The necessarily bridged gap between Rule of Law Republicanism and Self Governing Democracy, in order to free posterity from being arbitrarily governed by the dead or the living [a swift trigger for revolution], brings forth the question of separating economic influences from the free market of ideas, lest corrupting economic favoritism from government be purchased one way or another.
Grammatic Nihlism and Styrofoam Skulled Morons
Jared Lee Loughner, Madman
He shot, & killed a bunch of Ppl. He's Skitzo. He thinks "English
Grammar" is a method for 'the government' to control people, in their own minds
He hates Sarah Palin [who's target map was mirrored on the left, you idiots, you],
He was a fan of Obama. But feared "Government" He is a truther, thinks the Mars Rover was faked,
believes in mind control, and a "new Currency" which is a metophor for Grammatic Nihilism illustrated by his
question to Gifford [her answer being what started his "beef"] which was
"what is government when words have no meaning"
If you think this shooting was politically motivated, let me say, you are Styrofoam Skulled Morons.
If you think the heated rhettoric in the media has any responsibility, his friends said he didn't pay
attention to the news or listen to talk radio.
One person said he leaned left, others said he wasn't interested in politics.
I would cite this quote "He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither"
but silencing speech and regulating metaphores would do absolutely nothing to stop skitzos like this from murder.
& The universal failure of Gun control laws should speak for itself.
There're TONS of sources that utterly debunk the popular narratives from the left
I've only skimmed the bare surface. DYOHW
He shot, & killed a bunch of Ppl. He's Skitzo. He thinks "English
Grammar" is a method for 'the government' to control people, in their own minds
He hates Sarah Palin [who's target map was mirrored on the left, you idiots, you],
He was a fan of Obama. But feared "Government" He is a truther, thinks the Mars Rover was faked,
believes in mind control, and a "new Currency" which is a metophor for Grammatic Nihilism illustrated by his
question to Gifford [her answer being what started his "beef"] which was
"what is government when words have no meaning"
If you think this shooting was politically motivated, let me say, you are Styrofoam Skulled Morons.
If you think the heated rhettoric in the media has any responsibility, his friends said he didn't pay
attention to the news or listen to talk radio.
One person said he leaned left, others said he wasn't interested in politics.
I would cite this quote "He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither"
but silencing speech and regulating metaphores would do absolutely nothing to stop skitzos like this from murder.
& The universal failure of Gun control laws should speak for itself.
There're TONS of sources that utterly debunk the popular narratives from the left
I've only skimmed the bare surface. DYOHW
1/17/11
03-09-10, From Natural Man Thru Reason To Capitalism
03-09-10, From Natural Man Thru Reason To Capitalism
If we shall begin by what is natural to man, (& presumably bear some loyalty to it) then should not feudalism/tribalism be considered the primary nature of man?
However if we should begin with what the cultures of Man agree to grant value upon (presuming time and unanimity to have some merit) then should we not assess honestly the methods to achieve those goals?
If so then Keynesian economics can demonstrably be charged with causing global recession; the merits of collectivism be damned in the eyes of the individual that can see what it reaps.
The difference in socialism and communism is apparent in the ignorance and apathy of the govt worker that demonstrably destroys his own freedom and wealth, and contrastingly the despondent nature of those that boat in anything that will float from Cuba.
We should be able to agree that a 45% Govt. interference in markets cannot be called free or Capitalist; however more specifically by nature the interference is detrimental to not only potential overall wealth but meritocracy.
We should be able to agree that a 45% Govt. interference in markets cannot be called free or Capitalist; however more specifically by nature the interference is detrimental to not only potential overall wealth but meritocracy.
Thus if even only the Lion share of the blame rests on Keynesian systems (not capitalist) for the current crisis, the inherent hypothesis of any money spent by govt is well spent, ignores that wealth does not create wealth but effort and self interest which is much lost when capital travels through bureaucracy to reach hands much lest thrifty, much less skilled for it.
________________________________________________________________________________________________ Without Popular sovereignty there can be no justice, without justice the law is in vein, without rule of law there can be no freedom, without freedom democracy is in vein.
To inhibit the tyranny of direct democracy and expropriate the angels of its nature, we elect representatives to develop and hire enforcers maintain law.
A Necessary aspect to the rule of law is sovereignty of Nation and Individual CITIZENS. Borders Build Civilizations which in their lacking inevitably FALL
________________________________________________________________________________________________
If you pay taxes it cost you, and if you don't, it still costs everyone else who pays taxes, which in turn leaves them with less to invest in the market which prevents the creation of jobs and makes everyone poorer for it INCLUDING YOU. Wealth creation starts with work, and diffusing cost destroys the incentives of self interest which GIVES PPL REASON TO BECOME DOCTORS
The entire Developed World has become Economically Illiterate Keynesian Socialist Monkeys and chattering won't change the rules of economics.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
To honestly consider all Muslims to be the same you must ignore the diversity of sects, Quranic Interpretations, Abrogating Orders, and Selected Hadiths, within Islam as well as the pervasive diversity of mind inherent in human beings. Not to mention the Ignorance of non-Arab converts and Arab Illiterates. Do not be swayed by the easiness of intellectual extremes. There are Muslims wholly outside the Political Islam-of-Islamo Fascism, AND there are Non-Violent Muslims who donate money to Islamic causes funding terrorism. The lack of inquiry as to how many donators know the actual use of the money can be blamed on PCness of the media who won’t even cover the causes themselves.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________"a government of laws and not of men." -John Adams
This means you hold the RIGHT to property ABOVE the supposed want or need of it. A Grass Roots sovereignty as laid down in the 9th & 10th Amendments. This being the whole reason for a separation of powers and decentralized government.
Democracy is a part of a Republic, but so are LIMITATIONS, Representatives Do Not get to establish Entitlements at the cost of Rights. Guaranteeing privileges destroy self Govt. Destroy FREEDOM.
__________________________
-Asderathos L'Chaim Kankyou
Rebuttal To SFE's "Fact Check" On GB CPAC Speech
2-28-10 A Rebuttal To the San Fransicko Examiner's "Fact Check" and Commentary on Glenn Beck's CPAC Speech
- Watch Glenn's (-Hour Long) CPAC Speech Here -
Guess what the San Fran Sicko Examiner has deployed Fact Check Upon!?~No Not ANYTHING in Washington, not even anything in California, Glenn Beck's CPAC Speech
Here's ,my Addressing (if not debunking) of the debunking :D (I don’t exactly have a research staff)
1. Hope For America,
How do you debunk someone's hope? By attacking the man that inspired it! How could Reagan, who left office with a higher GDP Debt, possibly inspire hope for American because debt is bad!? Real journalism and ethics would expound upon why this was. (yeah I'll let better men explain it)
2. Beck doesn’t speak from a Teleprompter, but from the heart,
Yes beck uses a Teleprompter on his TV show (he admits it), However he not only obviously flubs words but asks for details from his producer showing not only no overreliance on it but also is known on the show for tangential monologues. & yes he had a NOTEBOOK for his near hour long speech which he referred to (Several times) IE a few, however he did not remain glued to the podium, nor was his speech written for him. Watch the speech and see how much he uses his notes (he doesn’t have a teleprompter on stage).
3. Progressivism was Designed to destroy the Constitution.
Ryan Witt ( of the San Fran Sicko Examiner) argues that “Progressive Policies” include the Direct Election of Senators & Women’s Right to vote. Talk about selective memory. I’ll counter With Eugenics (Instituted in the US the sterilization of the “Unfit”), Prohibition (Which basically created Gangsterism in America), Fascism its self (IE Unpatriotic Nationalism and Socialism) The Propaganda Machine that inspired Hitler’s, The NRA (National Recovery Administration), The Treaty of Versailles, The Blue Eagle, The Great Depression, & Third Way Politics (a specific strategy for whittling away the constitution into nothing)
4. The Communist Pamphlet endorsing Progressives as Comrades
Beck quotes “Sections” of a Communist pamphlet, as it describes progressives as comrades, to show the only SUBSTANTIVE Difference in the broad scheme of things between Marxism and progressivism is tactics of Revolution Vs Evolution.
Ryan Witt says you can’t allow “Opponents” to define you, of course his non-sequitur “Beck is a racist if the Ku Klux Klan decides to support him.” presumes Communists to oppose Progressives despite a rich History to the contrary ; progressives distancing themselves from Marxists was largely a differing belief in tactics not by any means the broader scope of ends.
5. Marxism Is Revolution Progressivism is Evolution (To the same Ends)
Beck was speaking in sweeping broad terms (compared with Witt’s interpretation that is), they are both centralized Statist Ideologies. From the perspective a Constitutional Libertarian even if Obama/FDR were aiming for a maximum of say 75% govt CONTROL of the “Factors of Production” it is still STATISM Beck’s very point. I don’t say regulate as the original definition meaning “to Make Regular” DOES NOT APPLY by all standards of measuring progressivism or Obama policies.
6. Van Jones, Self Avowed Communist
There’s tape of Jones saying he was a communist. That is not up for debate (Going by Witt you would think it were). Addressing Witt’s quote, is that the only ‘Evidence’ of Jones’ “Disavowing Communism”? Govt. Job Banks? Govt. Subsidization of ONE aspect of Energy Industry? Reinvention rather than Reform? In any case there is no misconstruing Jones as anything but a statist. The whole quote was an obvious political ploy to make it SEEM like there’s “Common Ground” where there isn’t.
7. Progressivism Is A Cancer & Must Be Eradicated
Beck is specifically addressing working within the System to VOTE THEM OUT. I did wince that he was not as explicit as humanly possible (Only 75% so), but not even an insane murderous lunatic would think he is advocating violence if they’re paying enough attention to take what he says seriously enough to compare it with their delusional outlook. It takes a leftist to read violence into Beck’s words who staunch advocate of reform NOT revolution.
8. 40-36-20 America is?
Beck Cites a poll (his numbers are right) on America self described as mostly Conservative BUT 49% are self described “Democrats” (same poll) Of course Beck hates both parties so this has nothing to do with anything. J And then Witt cites a poll says that 65% of Americans support the "progressive" public option in health care reform. Of course Beck’s most recent addressing the issue cites a polling at 26% Pro what is consistently, misleadingly termed “Health Care Reform” seeing as how Tort isn’t even being addressed & is the most likely reform to actually do any GOOD. (not to mention all the pork)
9. Govt. Is Incapable of Job Creation
As Beck points out for every “Govt. Created Job” how many were lost? 16? Or 1600? Well since market forces keep jobs in existence by providing services directly to ppl who HAVE A CHOICE, there is competition & excellence, whilst (I don’t have the numbers) but millions of dollars are funding just a dozen jobs under Obama’s “Stimulus”. Watch Beck for better details. =P
10. Govt Is Only REEEALLY Supposed To Protect Us From the Bad Guys
Citing the Preamble of the Constitution, Witt lists, Justice, Domestic Tranquility, Common Defense, General Welfare, and Secure Liberty for Ourselves & Posterity supposedly to rebut the generalization. Of course this misconstruement must highlight in the eyes of the educated the difference between the original interpretation of the constitution and the progressive reinterpretation; the main example of which is the phrase “General Welfare” however within the framework & examples of original perspective of the founders I am confident that little else was meant by the terminology than simply put “Protecting us from bad guys” which would include those who would play favorites in Govt. and the prevention of undue skirmishes and conflicts with a uniform law. Duh.
11. Americans Do Not Need “Encouragement” To Be Charitable
Witt cites the tax code that does INDEED “Encourage” Americans to charity however Beck was (to a conservative) OBVIOUSLY alluding to Govt.’s Tax & Redistribute Policies, as well as Volunteerism Propaganda Campaign. Witt then notes the majority of our charity goes to “Places of Worship” in America, (Ignoring that the US gives about more Charity than All other Nations combined) and then cites that building of Churches “[does qualify] but it certainly differs from donations to the Haitian relief fund“. I’d bet my left arm we gave the most to Haiti. And apparently no-one on the left gets that Churches do more than build more churches.
12. “Economic Holocaust Is Coming”
Witt complains beck does not cite any economist saying this, and then pronounces “Many economists project a slow recovery [in the coming years]” But of course beck wasn’t up there to cite sources, he does that in his books and you can see many interviewed on his show. One such similar warning however did come from one of the VERY few Economists who predicted the Recession IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!~
13. The Depression of 1921
Witt Admits Beck Is right (again); however he cites Beck blaming Woodrow Wilson (The Anti War Candidate who within a year entered us in The Great War: WWI) saying it was the post war bust that caused it not Wilson… Hmmm
14. Woodrow Wilson Sucks
Witt cites many of the things, (that incidentally I associated with Progressivism previously), as that Beck described Wilson as to blame for. The Intricacies of which can probably be found in books like “Woodrow Wilson and the Roots of Modern Liberalism” And “American Progressivism” They’re on my Reading List… I’m not the wizard of Oz, but I do vaguely recall there being various ins and outs which do nothing but indict Wilson.
Witt cites the 77% tax as only being on the Uber Rich!~ (I’m pretty sure Beck cited it as a Progressive Tax which ENTAILS THAT ITS ONLY ON THE RICH) Of course any understanding of Economics AT ALL tells us that Poor ppl Don’t Exactly Create Jobs! And Punishing Success Doesn’t exactly get you more of it.
15. Liberal-Progressive Name Switch!
Witt goes after the name switching of “Liberal” with “Progressive” lacking any historical nuance by the blunder of “They’ve always been interchangeable” when there are clear language shifts in history; and then cites that Conservatives don’t call themselves “Right Wing” which is specifically and DIRECTLY because of the leftist False dichotomy - Communist/Fascist Political Spectrum. Both Travesties of Language & History.
16. Harding, Coolidge, and the Roaring 20s
WWI for the US was a war of choice not necessity which was exactly what Wilson used to develop his fascist policies he couldn’t get to work without the war. I would suggest that decreasing Govt. is never easy even when the Dictator’s term & his War Excuse end at the same time.
Beck is a Capitalist, not a Kynesian-ist, so why should he explain the status quo of Keynesians who’ve largely had control of history since FDR?
17. Hoover, Depression Progressive, and The Fed
I suck at Explaining the Fed and Great Depression so Watch Milton Friedman Explain it.
Perhaps there’s not enough on Hoover’s involvement, Check your local Library XD
The Great Depression Was Ongoing DURRING WWII and thus did not its self end it >_> I think… It was the unique monetary position of lending that the Victorious USA had after WWII which substantively got us out of it. Read “New Deal Or Raw Deal”
18. The Statue Of Liberty; Symbol Of…
Witt would seem to presume that the modern attitudes of the French or that what “Most have said” has anything to do with ONE ARTIST’S and ONE POET’S Intent 100 years ago, …. Mno. And in fact contexts of history would suggest Beck’s is the more accurate & informed perspective. He’s given more details in previous segments of his Fox News TV Show And Presumably on Radio too.
- Watch Glenn's (-Hour Long) CPAC Speech Here -
1-21-2010 THEORIES VS HISTORY
1-21-2010 THEORIES VS HISTORY
Where is there the pursuit of comparing the 'State of Nature'-Theoretical concepts for society such as "The Federation of Liberty" Vs "The Union of Liberty" arguments with over arching Constitutional Classical Liberalism and its historical real world application's failures in maintaining a standard of freedom?
The State of Nature Theories oft as I've heard them discussed leaves a ludicrous number of details to the imagination.
Whilst the Constitutional History uncomfortably shows that many inherent flaws existing from the beginning (as will occur with any human institution) Not the least of which was slavery, the throwing off of which, in many ways, contributed to the current status quo of economic 'slavery' (or at least indentured servitude).
The status quo of economic slavery is majoritarily accepted as a great evil today (under the names of Socialism, Keynesian Economics, Progressivism, or Big Govt), but Political correctness or ignorance hides the source of it in the vital necessity of throwing off The Unparalleled evil of Slavery in the first place.
So, without slavery (or racial tensions which come with a racially mixed society) what would the united states look like today? Would women's Sufferage have come about? or Prohibition? Would Classic Liberalism have Endured? would it have evolved to current Human Equalities without the cost of economic freedom?
Slavery being in itself a deviation from capitalism (Under which humans cannot qualify as property nor their enslavement be a part of what is DEFINED as "Economic Freedom").
In fact (Capitalism being Absolute Economic Freedom) America has never really been a purely Capitalist society (as some socialists will argue when they advocate their 'Utopianism') However all the various mixed economies and partial freedoms' resulting prosperity for America, Can Be Traced Back to Being Caused by the Greater Economic Freedom!~ And never the limitations.
(Modernally the call is heard against "Deregulation" (as the cause of the recession) yet the madness of it is (not only are corruption and rule breaking to blame making enforcement the issue much like Illegal Immigration) but that they call Instituting the REGULATION of giving loans to the unqualified because of their skin color (practically a racial quota) a "deregulation, (For "Equality")!!
INCONCEIVABLE!~ ludicrous EVEN~
A REAL Deregulation would be to allow interstate insurance competition, which was only prohibited in the first place, by a Misinterpretation of the Constitution, perceiving "Regulation" of interstate comerce (at the time meaning to make regular) with CONTROL of.
Always be on the lookout for vague undefined or not juxtaposed use of language, behind it hypocrisy is lurking.
this has been Asderathos, and remember, I am Not a freaking 'Intellectual'________________________________________________________________________________________________
Where is there the pursuit of comparing the 'State of Nature'-Theoretical concepts for society such as "The Federation of Liberty" Vs "The Union of Liberty" arguments with over arching Constitutional Classical Liberalism and its historical real world application's failures in maintaining a standard of freedom?
The State of Nature Theories oft as I've heard them discussed leaves a ludicrous number of details to the imagination.
Whilst the Constitutional History uncomfortably shows that many inherent flaws existing from the beginning (as will occur with any human institution) Not the least of which was slavery, the throwing off of which, in many ways, contributed to the current status quo of economic 'slavery' (or at least indentured servitude).
The status quo of economic slavery is majoritarily accepted as a great evil today (under the names of Socialism, Keynesian Economics, Progressivism, or Big Govt), but Political correctness or ignorance hides the source of it in the vital necessity of throwing off The Unparalleled evil of Slavery in the first place.
So, without slavery (or racial tensions which come with a racially mixed society) what would the united states look like today? Would women's Sufferage have come about? or Prohibition? Would Classic Liberalism have Endured? would it have evolved to current Human Equalities without the cost of economic freedom?
Slavery being in itself a deviation from capitalism (Under which humans cannot qualify as property nor their enslavement be a part of what is DEFINED as "Economic Freedom").
In fact (Capitalism being Absolute Economic Freedom) America has never really been a purely Capitalist society (as some socialists will argue when they advocate their 'Utopianism') However all the various mixed economies and partial freedoms' resulting prosperity for America, Can Be Traced Back to Being Caused by the Greater Economic Freedom!~ And never the limitations.
(Modernally the call is heard against "Deregulation" (as the cause of the recession) yet the madness of it is (not only are corruption and rule breaking to blame making enforcement the issue much like Illegal Immigration) but that they call Instituting the REGULATION of giving loans to the unqualified because of their skin color (practically a racial quota) a "deregulation, (For "Equality")!!
INCONCEIVABLE!~ ludicrous EVEN~
A REAL Deregulation would be to allow interstate insurance competition, which was only prohibited in the first place, by a Misinterpretation of the Constitution, perceiving "Regulation" of interstate comerce (at the time meaning to make regular) with CONTROL of.
Always be on the lookout for vague undefined or not juxtaposed use of language, behind it hypocrisy is lurking.
this has been Asderathos, and remember, I am Not a freaking 'Intellectual'
1-3-10 THE REPUBLIC BETRAYED
1-3-10 THE REPUBLIC BETRAYED
Republic, Democracy, Democratic Republic, Call it whatever you will, quibble semantics Aaall you want, but get the definition the History, Right! The Founding Fathers Put in place a Republic (res publica = rule of law) wherein the direct democratic (demos = common ppl, kratos = rule IE Rule of the Ppl) election of representatives was purposefullycircumvented because it was known that DIRECT Democracy is merely a Tyranny of the Majority.
And we have fallen into more of a Democratic Tyranny by way of "Representatives" either being Populists without Morals gaming the system Or Highly Moral Revolutionary Fascists seeking to Impose their Collectivist morality on the ppl by far and away ABOVE The Individual and State Sovereignty Described in the 10th Amendment.
Etymology's Place
Popular Understanding of language Trumps Etymological Truth by way of intent (for communication), Except when necessarily applied for understanding history and current Sociology or Politics.
Political Correctness
governmental dictatorship of truth
or rather dictatorship of what is considered to be "true"
regardless of demonstratable facts, reason, or logic
Political Correctness is by example of history, A Governmental Ideological or Organizational Dictatorship of what is "True" particularly within Controversial Issues or actions of that Dictatorial power; with demonization of dissenters by agents of or sympathizers with that Power or its agenda.
Political Correctness, is inherently destructive or derisive of free speech; and is even more effective when a cultural rather than openly legal implementation, pitting ppl against ppl, rather than ideas vs Ideas which with any honesty and reason would necessitous arrive at some measure of Objective Truth.
_____________________________
Take note of the Value of Economic Freedom without which there cannot be Individual Sovereignty; A socialist would say govt handouts create it, but dependence cannot = autonomy; a Purity of which would be anarchy, but restraint only with representative taxation and Rule of Law creates the most Freedom Possible without creating an enslavement to defense of self family and property as is necessitous with anarchy, nor an enslavement to a god-state from which all blessings and all rights must flow with Tyrannical Communism Fascism Socialism or Global Government.
If your goal is freedom in the highest, then logically it is clear what you must and must not advocate lest you be a hypocrite or liar. =)
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Republic, Democracy, Democratic Republic, Call it whatever you will, quibble semantics Aaall you want, but get the definition the History, Right! The Founding Fathers Put in place a Republic (res publica = rule of law) wherein the direct democratic (demos = common ppl, kratos = rule IE Rule of the Ppl) election of representatives was purposefullycircumvented because it was known that DIRECT Democracy is merely a Tyranny of the Majority.
And we have fallen into more of a Democratic Tyranny by way of "Representatives" either being Populists without Morals gaming the system Or Highly Moral Revolutionary Fascists seeking to Impose their Collectivist morality on the ppl by far and away ABOVE The Individual and State Sovereignty Described in the 10th Amendment.
Etymology's Place
Popular Understanding of language Trumps Etymological Truth by way of intent (for communication), Except when necessarily applied for understanding history and current Sociology or Politics.
Political Correctness
governmental dictatorship of truth
or rather dictatorship of what is considered to be "true"
regardless of demonstratable facts, reason, or logic
Political Correctness is by example of history, A Governmental Ideological or Organizational Dictatorship of what is "True" particularly within Controversial Issues or actions of that Dictatorial power; with demonization of dissenters by agents of or sympathizers with that Power or its agenda.
Political Correctness, is inherently destructive or derisive of free speech; and is even more effective when a cultural rather than openly legal implementation, pitting ppl against ppl, rather than ideas vs Ideas which with any honesty and reason would necessitous arrive at some measure of Objective Truth.
_____________________________
Take note of the Value of Economic Freedom without which there cannot be Individual Sovereignty; A socialist would say govt handouts create it, but dependence cannot = autonomy; a Purity of which would be anarchy, but restraint only with representative taxation and Rule of Law creates the most Freedom Possible without creating an enslavement to defense of self family and property as is necessitous with anarchy, nor an enslavement to a god-state from which all blessings and all rights must flow with Tyrannical Communism Fascism Socialism or Global Government.
If your goal is freedom in the highest, then logically it is clear what you must and must not advocate lest you be a hypocrite or liar. =)
________________________________________________________________________________________________
11-09-09 LEVITICUS
11-09-09 LEVITICUS
Leviticus 20:13
If a man lies with mankind as he lieth with womankind,
both of them have done what is detestable,
both of them have committed an abomination
They both shall surely be put to death
Leviticus 11-7
And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you
___
What? I'm asking you, and myself, amongst the men of the earth, do Leviticus 20:13 and 11-7 have to do with each other,
Gays are not swine after all
Well, besides chapter, verse falls under that which reason has prohibited in defiance of what one would purport to be "God's Will" But CANNOT be, to a Jeffersonian mind, abiding by Libertine Philosophy
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear."
Ppl that ate pork until recently, biblically speaking, DIED FROM IT, (I doubt the gays did much better spreading Disease)
My perspective is that Death was the punishment for nhilistic anti human Risky behaviors destructive to society; However society less close to the bone can abide it, tolerate it, but, but, still should not condone, approve, or accept as normal this behavior.
(In a libertarian society you are a sovereign citizen, but this is my recomendation) ...
I attribute the nuclear family with being the cornerstone of a stable society, all one need do is look at the demographics for a certain ppl who, coincidentally, embraced this deviation, and the consequences
Reverend Manning, of whom I was a fan, was banned from posting new videos to YouTube, I can only conclude (from the video) for calling Gays not Normal
NORMAL: conforming to the standard, or the common type, usual, not abnormal; regular; natural
If Homosexuality ever became “Normal” that would be the end of NATURAL Reproduction
Its a given that the Progressive Politically correct establishment is pushed the envelope beyond tolerance to mandated acceptance (This is why GayMarriage is being pushed by activist judges) but know that I don’t hate Gays, I just find their “Sexuality” Nauseating, and objectively bad for society
If You wouldn’t silence me from saying Leather Fetishists are oogy and bad for society don’t be a hypocrite and advocate it for other sexual deviants. I am a "Libertarian" But that does not prevent me from having opinions as to what is good for society, it only prevents me from enforcing that opinion by force of law or barrel of gun.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Leviticus 20:13
If a man lies with mankind as he lieth with womankind,
both of them have done what is detestable,
both of them have committed an abomination
They both shall surely be put to death
Leviticus 11-7
And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you
___
What? I'm asking you, and myself, amongst the men of the earth, do Leviticus 20:13 and 11-7 have to do with each other,
Gays are not swine after all
Well, besides chapter, verse falls under that which reason has prohibited in defiance of what one would purport to be "God's Will" But CANNOT be, to a Jeffersonian mind, abiding by Libertine Philosophy
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear."
Ppl that ate pork until recently, biblically speaking, DIED FROM IT, (I doubt the gays did much better spreading Disease)
My perspective is that Death was the punishment for nhilistic anti human Risky behaviors destructive to society; However society less close to the bone can abide it, tolerate it, but, but, still should not condone, approve, or accept as normal this behavior.
(In a libertarian society you are a sovereign citizen, but this is my recomendation) ...
I attribute the nuclear family with being the cornerstone of a stable society, all one need do is look at the demographics for a certain ppl who, coincidentally, embraced this deviation, and the consequences
Reverend Manning, of whom I was a fan, was banned from posting new videos to YouTube, I can only conclude (from the video) for calling Gays not Normal
NORMAL: conforming to the standard, or the common type, usual, not abnormal; regular; natural
If Homosexuality ever became “Normal” that would be the end of NATURAL Reproduction
Its a given that the Progressive Politically correct establishment is pushed the envelope beyond tolerance to mandated acceptance (This is why GayMarriage is being pushed by activist judges) but know that I don’t hate Gays, I just find their “Sexuality” Nauseating, and objectively bad for society
If You wouldn’t silence me from saying Leather Fetishists are oogy and bad for society don’t be a hypocrite and advocate it for other sexual deviants. I am a "Libertarian" But that does not prevent me from having opinions as to what is good for society, it only prevents me from enforcing that opinion by force of law or barrel of gun.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
7-9-09 AMERICAN CULTURE DISAMBIGUATED
7-9-09 AMERICAN CULTURE DISAMBIGUATED
Johann Gottfried Herder's principle of Cult Patriotism, (Although One might say Cult "Nationalism" or "Tribalism" Going by Hitler's statement that he was a Nationalist not a "Patriot") generally based in a tribal romanticism of a race culture or nation, (which originated with Rousseau’s solely political arguments) laid the intellectual foundation for Nazism (National Socialism). Cult Patriotism disambiguated is an extremist version of Generic Patriotism.
American Patriotism for instance can be that of flag waving ignorance, or deep philosophical and historic understanding of the unique ideas laid down by our founding fathers, of Freedom, Individualism, Natural Human Rights, and the authority of Law over Men (allowing no man to arise a tyrant). Whereas Fascism values a Populist Conclusion of the greatest good by far over individual Human Rights, and the Leader above the law as ultimate Judge Jury King and Executioner; Whereas American Separation of Powers divides the three branches of Govt. relinquishing “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” (the 10th Amendment) purposefully to make it a nation of Sovereign individuals subject only to the law, and never Men.
Hoover went to Russia and “Rationalized” smelting into a 2 million dollar profit, which soon after the Communist Revolution disappeared, because the workers brutalized the native experts who knew how to keep the machines working and sent away the American Experts. If you cannot see the lesson from this, I can only say to you, punish excellence and you’ll have less of it, reward excellence and you’ll have more. Revolutions Need Leaders, and we were lucky enough to have one’s scornful of a corrupt Monarchy and wise in the ways other forms of govt. can go wrong.
“American Culture”, I’ve heard disturbingly often, “doesn’t exist”. They get this from multiculturalism. An ideology of removing the flame of Assimilation from the melting pot, and without commonalities, of which the few left that there are, are necessarily (by leftist ideology) deemphasized for the elevation of differences, in a frenzy of xenophelia. This is a recipe for civil war.
American culture is one of tolerance, assimilation, and acceptance of those that wish to embrace American Values (Regardless of their other intransigent aspects of culture, or of their race). We being a broad tent society, have room for those “yearning to be free”; however, other isms, than this Americanism, have been infiltrating the US for decades, and are working to enslave us to their vision of utopia, destructive to not only freedom but identity.
This Ideology by design is purposeful in polarization to destroy common culture, unity, and project victim and oppressor statuses onto every aspect of life Politicizing Your Very Perception of the World using Political Correctness (The Ideology Telling You What Not To Say) & Identity Politics (The Ideology Telling You Who Is Saying It), the ends of which are centralized govt. and forced equality regardless of merit. The means of which are infiltration and usurpation thru indoctrination, of the Professions of education, the law, media, politics, & also activist philanthropy.
They claim to champion freedom, having proven themselves the epitome of double standards, & hypocrisy, they cover up the corruption, not by conspiracy but by mutual elevation of ideology above the moral standards of the current system in aspiration of transcendence. AKA, the ends justify the means. A Willfully Blind Cultural censorship of, the Politically Incorrect; demonized as heretics to the New System. Never mind what the Founding Fathers Envisioned (or Martin Luther King for that matter), never mind what the constitution actually says, never mind the facts, after all it is a living document·
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Johann Gottfried Herder's principle of Cult Patriotism, (Although One might say Cult "Nationalism" or "Tribalism" Going by Hitler's statement that he was a Nationalist not a "Patriot") generally based in a tribal romanticism of a race culture or nation, (which originated with Rousseau’s solely political arguments) laid the intellectual foundation for Nazism (National Socialism). Cult Patriotism disambiguated is an extremist version of Generic Patriotism.
American Patriotism for instance can be that of flag waving ignorance, or deep philosophical and historic understanding of the unique ideas laid down by our founding fathers, of Freedom, Individualism, Natural Human Rights, and the authority of Law over Men (allowing no man to arise a tyrant). Whereas Fascism values a Populist Conclusion of the greatest good by far over individual Human Rights, and the Leader above the law as ultimate Judge Jury King and Executioner; Whereas American Separation of Powers divides the three branches of Govt. relinquishing “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” (the 10th Amendment) purposefully to make it a nation of Sovereign individuals subject only to the law, and never Men.
Hoover went to Russia and “Rationalized” smelting into a 2 million dollar profit, which soon after the Communist Revolution disappeared, because the workers brutalized the native experts who knew how to keep the machines working and sent away the American Experts. If you cannot see the lesson from this, I can only say to you, punish excellence and you’ll have less of it, reward excellence and you’ll have more. Revolutions Need Leaders, and we were lucky enough to have one’s scornful of a corrupt Monarchy and wise in the ways other forms of govt. can go wrong.
“American Culture”, I’ve heard disturbingly often, “doesn’t exist”. They get this from multiculturalism. An ideology of removing the flame of Assimilation from the melting pot, and without commonalities, of which the few left that there are, are necessarily (by leftist ideology) deemphasized for the elevation of differences, in a frenzy of xenophelia. This is a recipe for civil war.
American culture is one of tolerance, assimilation, and acceptance of those that wish to embrace American Values (Regardless of their other intransigent aspects of culture, or of their race). We being a broad tent society, have room for those “yearning to be free”; however, other isms, than this Americanism, have been infiltrating the US for decades, and are working to enslave us to their vision of utopia, destructive to not only freedom but identity.
This Ideology by design is purposeful in polarization to destroy common culture, unity, and project victim and oppressor statuses onto every aspect of life Politicizing Your Very Perception of the World using Political Correctness (The Ideology Telling You What Not To Say) & Identity Politics (The Ideology Telling You Who Is Saying It), the ends of which are centralized govt. and forced equality regardless of merit. The means of which are infiltration and usurpation thru indoctrination, of the Professions of education, the law, media, politics, & also activist philanthropy.
They claim to champion freedom, having proven themselves the epitome of double standards, & hypocrisy, they cover up the corruption, not by conspiracy but by mutual elevation of ideology above the moral standards of the current system in aspiration of transcendence. AKA, the ends justify the means. A Willfully Blind Cultural censorship of, the Politically Incorrect; demonized as heretics to the New System. Never mind what the Founding Fathers Envisioned (or Martin Luther King for that matter), never mind what the constitution actually says, never mind the facts, after all it is a living document·
________________________________________________________________________________________________
6-19-09 Ideology
6-19-09 Ideology
My Ideology consists (when whittled down) of Three words… “We Are Human.”
But that only begs the question...
Well, Hitler was human, Gandhi was human, Bin Ladin, Thomas Jefferson, Edgar Allan Poe, Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, and Enoch Powell, Charles Manson, Marylin Manson, Marylin Munroe, You, I, We, are all human.
We are not born angels and demons, Gods or Mice, we are human, No matter the monsters or martyrs we become, in the eyes of the people.
The meaning OF life (to me, self evident) is to find meaning IN life, of course the murderers of the world have failed at this having taken life unjustly (as that is the definition of murder), but many soldiers with noble causes have succeeded.
regarding WAR
To Quote Ronald Reagan-
“The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all. You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said that "the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits — not animals." And he said, "There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty."
“A Time For Choosing” a speech by Ronald Reagan, for me its a three way tie with “I have a Dream” and the “Declaration of Independence” for the most important speech in American history, we the United states of America, might I remind you, are the greatest experiment in freedom in the history of man. If you accept that, think on it, if you have not study up.
regarding Freedom and Slavery
Surrender is the dissolution of freedom, it is slavery. Hopefully most of us acknowledge it is not good to be a slave and is thus not good to keep a slave. (Forgive the linguistically simplistic logic, I’d hate to see it applied elsewhere) Why then is indentured servitude allowed? You might say it isn’t but in the form of contracts it is. If you break a contract you can be sued, jailed. So why if slavery is an evil are contracts stating other than if you do this I’ll pay you this, allowed? (feel free to give an answer if you have one) I merely contend a higher morality, and simply reasoned principle, that being anti slavery should mean protection from giving away freedom in this form.
Taking note of History, we should observe that many ppl will wish to enslave or murder others, whether because of Ideology stemming from culture or culture from ideology. Teaching (in govt hands) has proven inefecient at to not producing ppl of this type.
Regarding Education
I contend that besides the rare deranged (for he is inevitable) a free market of ideas made manifest in a privatization of the school system meeting minimum requirements for safety, end of year testing and keeping of the Academic Bill Of Rights, (from first grade up) Would prevent indoctrination or radicalization to a much greater extent than the great morass of centralized bureaucracy handling curriculum and funding.
regarding the Constitution
In its time, the constitution was much better understood via the Federalist Papers, a book still available to the public today, while not understood at all by ppl claiming constitutional scholarship and doctorates. Case In Point Barack Obama 2001 Radio Interview
OBAMA: “If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay.
But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change and in some ways we still suffer from that.”
Individual Freedom, is a key theme of the Constitution, The reason we have (or had) a three tiered Govt, a separation of powers, which were supposed to (and did and kinda sorta still are) keep each other in check. The Amount of power vested in the Federal Govt. weather it is Taxing the bejeezus out of you or showering you with lavish welfare checks, in doing so, your freedom is diminished. Under progressive taxation your amount of thriving is diminished, to support welfare recipients, which if you yourself are on, then you lose the right to fail or thrive on your own merits. America was never a Utopia, but in the attempt to make it one we have become a dystopia. A restoration of the Constitution IN THE CONTEXT OF HISTORIES NO LONGER TAUGHT (but somehow learned), such as the Federalist Papers and Founding Faith, we can restore our Meritocracy.
Regarding Language
Monopolies always used to be understood as bad, a destruction of competition, which must exist to create and maintain quality and efficiency on its own (The freedom of meritocracy). But ideology deviating from freedom cannot afford its’ competition. This Hypocrisy was hidden, by mere associative psychological warfare. The Old Totalitarian trick, "tell a lie often enough and it Becomes the Truth", ideology over perception.
Thus self described liberals are able to, and are acheiving the destruction of competition Economically and ideologically, using the most Fascist of tactics.
Popular Synonyms of good; Progressive (without question of goal) Liberal (without question of necessary borders) Democratic (without inquiry as to an Informed electorate)
An Ongoing Affirmative action requires by logic that either those benefiting are either inherently incapable or those not benefiting are inherently oppressive.
Gay marriage (oxymoron) puts the right to manipulate the law by its rewriting language, up for grabs, either legislatively (or judicially vetoing legislation)
If language and our understanding of it defines the law, how then can we allow Courts or Ballots the right to official redefinition of language, thereby subverting the law.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
My Ideology consists (when whittled down) of Three words… “We Are Human.”
But that only begs the question...
Well, Hitler was human, Gandhi was human, Bin Ladin, Thomas Jefferson, Edgar Allan Poe, Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, and Enoch Powell, Charles Manson, Marylin Manson, Marylin Munroe, You, I, We, are all human.
We are not born angels and demons, Gods or Mice, we are human, No matter the monsters or martyrs we become, in the eyes of the people.
The meaning OF life (to me, self evident) is to find meaning IN life, of course the murderers of the world have failed at this having taken life unjustly (as that is the definition of murder), but many soldiers with noble causes have succeeded.
regarding WAR
To Quote Ronald Reagan-
“The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all. You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said that "the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits — not animals." And he said, "There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty."
“A Time For Choosing” a speech by Ronald Reagan, for me its a three way tie with “I have a Dream” and the “Declaration of Independence” for the most important speech in American history, we the United states of America, might I remind you, are the greatest experiment in freedom in the history of man. If you accept that, think on it, if you have not study up.
regarding Freedom and Slavery
Surrender is the dissolution of freedom, it is slavery. Hopefully most of us acknowledge it is not good to be a slave and is thus not good to keep a slave. (Forgive the linguistically simplistic logic, I’d hate to see it applied elsewhere) Why then is indentured servitude allowed? You might say it isn’t but in the form of contracts it is. If you break a contract you can be sued, jailed. So why if slavery is an evil are contracts stating other than if you do this I’ll pay you this, allowed? (feel free to give an answer if you have one) I merely contend a higher morality, and simply reasoned principle, that being anti slavery should mean protection from giving away freedom in this form.
Taking note of History, we should observe that many ppl will wish to enslave or murder others, whether because of Ideology stemming from culture or culture from ideology. Teaching (in govt hands) has proven inefecient at to not producing ppl of this type.
Regarding Education
I contend that besides the rare deranged (for he is inevitable) a free market of ideas made manifest in a privatization of the school system meeting minimum requirements for safety, end of year testing and keeping of the Academic Bill Of Rights, (from first grade up) Would prevent indoctrination or radicalization to a much greater extent than the great morass of centralized bureaucracy handling curriculum and funding.
regarding the Constitution
In its time, the constitution was much better understood via the Federalist Papers, a book still available to the public today, while not understood at all by ppl claiming constitutional scholarship and doctorates. Case In Point Barack Obama 2001 Radio Interview
OBAMA: “If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay.
But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change and in some ways we still suffer from that.”
Individual Freedom, is a key theme of the Constitution, The reason we have (or had) a three tiered Govt, a separation of powers, which were supposed to (and did and kinda sorta still are) keep each other in check. The Amount of power vested in the Federal Govt. weather it is Taxing the bejeezus out of you or showering you with lavish welfare checks, in doing so, your freedom is diminished. Under progressive taxation your amount of thriving is diminished, to support welfare recipients, which if you yourself are on, then you lose the right to fail or thrive on your own merits. America was never a Utopia, but in the attempt to make it one we have become a dystopia. A restoration of the Constitution IN THE CONTEXT OF HISTORIES NO LONGER TAUGHT (but somehow learned), such as the Federalist Papers and Founding Faith, we can restore our Meritocracy.
Regarding Language
Monopolies always used to be understood as bad, a destruction of competition, which must exist to create and maintain quality and efficiency on its own (The freedom of meritocracy). But ideology deviating from freedom cannot afford its’ competition. This Hypocrisy was hidden, by mere associative psychological warfare. The Old Totalitarian trick, "tell a lie often enough and it Becomes the Truth", ideology over perception.
Thus self described liberals are able to, and are acheiving the destruction of competition Economically and ideologically, using the most Fascist of tactics.
Popular Synonyms of good; Progressive (without question of goal) Liberal (without question of necessary borders) Democratic (without inquiry as to an Informed electorate)
An Ongoing Affirmative action requires by logic that either those benefiting are either inherently incapable or those not benefiting are inherently oppressive.
Gay marriage (oxymoron) puts the right to manipulate the law by its rewriting language, up for grabs, either legislatively (or judicially vetoing legislation)
If language and our understanding of it defines the law, how then can we allow Courts or Ballots the right to official redefinition of language, thereby subverting the law.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)