1/30/11

01-30-11 Explaining Capitalism Again


There is not, and can never be, any such thing as a purely economic, or purely governmental system to the total exclusion of one from the other. Any Governmental structure whatever its form, must be funded. The Market itself must bare confidence in security of exchange in order to be free. Where traditional “Government” does not operate, the ‘government’ of martial force comes to bare as a chief consideration upon all individuals. [Governments being instituted among men to secure their Creator endowed, unalienable rights, Life Liberty, and Property being among them]

Of course the imperfection of every form of Government known to man cannot negate the positive gain in secured trade. In a ‘State of Nature’ absent even the most primitive social contract, the market would be limited by the confidence of the participants. Where would voluntary exchange seem more secure, between hermits in a wilderness, or citizens of a governmental body which provides a police force?

For a “Market” to be “Free” its government must secure the rights of individuals to keep or sell their labor and property as they see fit [a minimal infringement/taxation required to fund that security].

Only “Anti-Capitalists” argue that “Capitalism” is not synonymous with a “Free Market System”, although many Anti-Capitalists would make no distinction while embracing the Marxian pejoratives which violate the principles of Economic Freedom.

All “Anti-Capitalist” systems, most of which brand themselves “Socialist” or “Communist” bare the unifying traits of infringing and violating the paradoxical principle of Maximum Property Rights and Limited/Minimal Government.

The necessarily bridged gap between Rule of Law Republicanism and Self Governing Democracy, in order to free posterity from being arbitrarily governed by the dead or the living [a swift trigger for revolution], brings forth the question of separating economic influences from the free market of ideas, lest corrupting economic favoritism from government be purchased one way or another.

Grammatic Nihlism and Styrofoam Skulled Morons

Jared Lee Loughner, Madman 
He shot, & killed a bunch of Ppl. He's Skitzo. He thinks "English 
Grammar" is a method for 'the government' to control people, in their own minds
He hates Sarah Palin [who's target map was mirrored on the left, you idiots, you],
He was a fan of Obama. But feared "Government" He is a truther, thinks the Mars Rover was faked, 
believes in mind control, and a "new Currency" which is a metophor for Grammatic Nihilism illustrated by his 
question to Gifford [her answer being what started his "beef"] which was 
"what is government when words have no meaning"

If you think this shooting was politically motivated, let me say, you are Styrofoam Skulled Morons.
If you think the heated rhettoric in the media has any responsibility, his friends said he didn't pay 
attention to the news or listen to talk radio.
One person said he leaned left, others said he wasn't interested in politics.

I would cite this quote "He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither"

but silencing speech and regulating metaphores would do absolutely nothing to stop skitzos like this from murder.
& The universal failure of Gun control laws should speak for itself.

There're TONS of sources that utterly debunk the popular narratives from the left
I've only skimmed the bare surface. DYOHW


1/17/11

03-09-10, From Natural Man Thru Reason To Capitalism

03-09-10, From Natural Man Thru Reason To Capitalism
 
If we shall begin by what is natural to man, (& presumably bear some loyalty to it) then should not feudalism/tribalism be considered the primary nature of man?

However if we should begin with what the cultures of Man agree to grant value upon (presuming time and unanimity to have some merit) then should we not assess honestly the methods to achieve those goals?

If so then Keynesian economics can demonstrably be charged with causing global recession; the merits of collectivism be damned in the eyes of the individual that can see what it reaps.

The difference in socialism and communism is apparent in the ignorance and apathy of the govt worker that demonstrably destroys his own freedom and wealth, and contrastingly the despondent nature of those that boat in anything that will float from Cuba.

We should be able to agree that a 45% Govt. interference in markets cannot be called free or Capitalist; however more specifically by nature the interference is detrimental to not only potential overall wealth but meritocracy.

Thus if even only the Lion share of the blame rests on Keynesian systems (not capitalist) for the current crisis, the inherent hypothesis of any money spent by govt is well spent, ignores that wealth does not create wealth but effort and self interest which is much lost when capital travels through bureaucracy to reach hands much lest thrifty, much less skilled for it. 
________________________________________________________________________________________________

Without Popular sovereignty there can be no justice, without justice the law is in vein, without rule of law there can be no freedom, without freedom democracy is in vein.

To inhibit the tyranny of direct democracy and expropriate the angels of its nature, we elect representatives to develop and hire enforcers maintain law.

A Necessary aspect to the rule of law is sovereignty of Nation and Individual CITIZENS. Borders Build Civilizations which in their lacking inevitably FALL
________________________________________________________________________________________________

If you pay taxes it cost you, and if you don't, it still costs everyone else who pays taxes, which in turn leaves them with less to invest in the market which prevents the creation of jobs and makes everyone poorer for it INCLUDING YOU. Wealth creation starts with work, and diffusing cost destroys the incentives of self interest which GIVES PPL REASON TO BECOME DOCTORS

The entire Developed World has become Economically Illiterate Keynesian Socialist Monkeys and chattering won't change the rules of economics.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________


To honestly consider all Muslims to be the same you must ignore the diversity of sects, Quranic Interpretations, Abrogating Orders, and Selected Hadiths, within Islam as well as the pervasive diversity of mind inherent in human beings. Not to mention the Ignorance of non-Arab converts and Arab Illiterates. Do not be swayed by the easiness of intellectual extremes. There are Muslims wholly outside the Political Islam-of-Islamo Fascism, AND there are Non-Violent Muslims who donate money to Islamic causes funding terrorism. The lack of inquiry as to how many donators know the actual use of the money can be blamed on PCness of the media who won’t even cover the causes themselves.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

"a government of laws and not of men." -John Adams

This means you hold the RIGHT to property ABOVE the supposed want or need of it. A Grass Roots sovereignty as laid down in the 9th & 10th Amendments. This being the whole reason for a separation of powers and decentralized government.

Democracy is a part of a Republic, but so are LIMITATIONS, Representatives Do Not get to establish Entitlements at the cost of Rights. Guaranteeing privileges destroy self Govt. Destroy FREEDOM. 

__________________________

-Asderathos L'Chaim Kankyou

Rebuttal To SFE's "Fact Check" On GB CPAC Speech

 2-28-10 A Rebuttal To the San Fransicko Examiner's "Fact Check" and Commentary on Glenn Beck's CPAC Speech

Guess what the San Fran Sicko Examiner has deployed Fact Check Upon!?~No Not ANYTHING in Washington, not even anything in California, Glenn Beck's CPAC Speech
Here's ,my Addressing (if not debunking) of the debunking :D (I don’t exactly have a research staff)
 
1. Hope For America,

How do you debunk someone's hope? By attacking the man that inspired it! How could Reagan, who left office with a higher GDP Debt, possibly inspire hope for American because debt is bad!? Real journalism and ethics would expound upon why this was. (yeah I'll let better men explain it)

2. Beck doesn’t speak from a Teleprompter, but from the heart,

Yes beck uses a Teleprompter on his TV show (he admits it), However he not only obviously flubs words but asks for details from his producer showing not only no overreliance on it but also is known on the show for tangential monologues. & yes he had a NOTEBOOK for his near hour long speech which he referred to (Several times) IE a few, however he did not remain glued to the podium, nor was his speech written for him. Watch the speech and see how much he uses his notes (he doesn’t have a teleprompter on stage).

 3. Progressivism was Designed to destroy the Constitution.

Ryan Witt ( of the San Fran Sicko Examiner) argues that “Progressive Policies” include the Direct Election of Senators & Women’s Right to vote. Talk about selective memory. I’ll counter With Eugenics (Instituted in the US the sterilization of the “Unfit”), Prohibition (Which basically created Gangsterism in America), Fascism its self (IE Unpatriotic Nationalism and Socialism) The Propaganda Machine that inspired Hitler’s, The NRA (National Recovery Administration), The Treaty of Versailles, The Blue Eagle, The Great Depression, & Third Way Politics (a specific strategy for whittling away the constitution into nothing)

4. The Communist Pamphlet endorsing Progressives as Comrades

Beck quotes “Sections” of a Communist pamphlet, as it describes progressives as comrades, to show the only SUBSTANTIVE Difference in the broad scheme of things between Marxism and progressivism is tactics of Revolution Vs Evolution.

Ryan Witt says you can’t allow “Opponents” to define you, of course his non-sequitur “Beck is a racist if the Ku Klux Klan decides to support him.” presumes Communists to oppose Progressives despite a rich History to the contrary ; progressives distancing themselves from Marxists was largely a differing belief in tactics not by any means the broader scope of ends.

5. Marxism Is Revolution Progressivism is Evolution (To the same Ends)

Beck was speaking in sweeping broad terms (compared with Witt’s interpretation that is), they are both centralized Statist Ideologies. From the perspective a Constitutional Libertarian even if Obama/FDR were aiming for a maximum of say 75% govt CONTROL of the “Factors of Production” it is still STATISM Beck’s very point. I don’t say regulate as the original definition meaning “to Make Regular” DOES NOT APPLY by all standards of measuring progressivism or Obama policies.

6. Van Jones, Self Avowed Communist

There’s tape of Jones saying he was a communist. That is not up for debate (Going by Witt you would think it were).  Addressing Witt’s quote, is that the only ‘Evidence’ of Jones’ “Disavowing Communism”? Govt. Job Banks? Govt. Subsidization of ONE aspect of Energy Industry? Reinvention rather than Reform?  In any case there is no misconstruing Jones as anything but a statist. The whole quote was an obvious political ploy to make it SEEM like there’s “Common Ground” where there isn’t.

7. Progressivism Is A Cancer & Must Be Eradicated

Beck is specifically addressing working within the System to VOTE THEM OUT. I did wince that he was not as explicit as humanly possible (Only 75% so), but not even an insane murderous lunatic would think he is advocating violence if they’re paying enough attention to take what he says seriously enough to compare it with their delusional outlook. It takes a leftist to read violence into Beck’s words who staunch advocate of reform NOT revolution.

8. 40-36-20 America is?

Beck Cites a poll (his numbers are right) on America self described as mostly Conservative BUT 49% are self described “Democrats” (same poll) Of course Beck hates both parties so this has nothing to do with anything. J And then Witt cites a poll says that 65% of Americans support the "progressive" public option in health care reform. Of course Beck’s most recent addressing the issue cites a polling at 26% Pro what is consistently, misleadingly termed “Health Care Reform” seeing as how Tort isn’t even being addressed & is the most likely reform to actually do any GOOD. (not to mention all the pork)

9. Govt. Is Incapable of Job Creation

As Beck points out for every “Govt. Created Job” how many were lost? 16? Or 1600? Well since market forces keep jobs in existence by providing services directly to ppl who HAVE A CHOICE, there is competition & excellence, whilst (I don’t have the numbers) but millions of dollars are funding just a dozen jobs under Obama’s “Stimulus”. Watch Beck for better details. =P

 10. Govt Is Only REEEALLY Supposed To Protect Us From the Bad Guys

Citing the Preamble of the Constitution, Witt lists, Justice, Domestic Tranquility, Common Defense, General Welfare, and Secure Liberty for Ourselves & Posterity supposedly to rebut the generalization. Of course this misconstruement must highlight in the eyes of the educated the difference between the original interpretation of the constitution and the progressive reinterpretation; the main example of which is the phrase “General Welfare” however within the framework & examples of original perspective of the founders I am confident that little else was meant by the terminology than simply put “Protecting us from bad guys” which would include those who would play favorites in Govt. and the prevention of undue skirmishes and conflicts with a uniform law. Duh.

11. Americans Do Not Need “Encouragement” To Be Charitable

Witt cites the tax code that does INDEED “Encourage” Americans to charity however Beck was (to a conservative) OBVIOUSLY alluding to Govt.’s Tax & Redistribute Policies, as well as Volunteerism Propaganda Campaign. Witt then notes the majority of our charity goes to “Places of Worship” in America, (Ignoring that the US gives about more Charity than All other Nations combined) and then cites that building of Churches “[does qualify] but it certainly differs from donations to the Haitian relief fund“. I’d bet my left arm we gave the most to Haiti. And apparently no-one on the left gets that Churches do more than build more churches.

12. “Economic Holocaust Is Coming”

Witt complains beck does not cite any economist saying this, and then pronounces “Many economists project a slow recovery [in the coming years]” But of course beck wasn’t up there to cite sources, he does that in  his books and you can see many interviewed on his show. One such similar warning however did come from one of the VERY few Economists who predicted the Recession IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!~   

13. The Depression of 1921

Witt Admits Beck Is right (again); however he cites Beck blaming Woodrow Wilson (The Anti War Candidate who within a year entered us in The Great War: WWI) saying it was the post war bust that caused it not Wilson… Hmmm

14. Woodrow Wilson Sucks

Witt cites many of the things, (that incidentally I associated with Progressivism previously), as that Beck described Wilson as to blame for. The Intricacies of which can probably be found in books like “Woodrow Wilson and the Roots of Modern Liberalism” And “American Progressivism” They’re on my Reading List… I’m not the wizard of Oz, but I do vaguely recall there being various ins and outs which do nothing but indict Wilson.

Witt cites the 77% tax as only being on the Uber Rich!~ (I’m pretty sure Beck cited it as a Progressive Tax which ENTAILS THAT ITS ONLY ON THE RICH) Of course any understanding of Economics AT ALL tells us that Poor ppl Don’t Exactly Create Jobs! And Punishing Success Doesn’t exactly get you more of it.

15. Liberal-Progressive Name Switch!

Witt goes after the name switching of “Liberal” with “Progressive” lacking any historical nuance by the blunder of “They’ve always been interchangeable” when there are clear language shifts in history; and then cites that Conservatives don’t call themselves “Right Wing” which is specifically and DIRECTLY because of the leftist False dichotomy - Communist/Fascist Political Spectrum. Both Travesties of Language & History.

16. Harding, Coolidge, and the Roaring 20s

WWI for the US was a war of choice not necessity which was exactly what Wilson used to develop his fascist policies he couldn’t get to work without the war. I would suggest that decreasing Govt. is never easy even when the Dictator’s term & his War Excuse end at the same time.

Beck is a Capitalist, not a Kynesian-ist, so why should he explain the status quo of Keynesians who’ve largely had control of history since FDR?

17. Hoover, Depression Progressive, and The Fed

I suck at Explaining the Fed and Great Depression so Watch Milton Friedman Explain it.

Perhaps there’s not enough on Hoover’s involvement, Check your local Library XD

The Great Depression Was Ongoing DURRING WWII and thus did not its self end it >_> I think… It was the unique monetary position of lending that the Victorious USA had after WWII which substantively got us out of it. Read “New Deal Or Raw Deal”

18. The Statue Of Liberty; Symbol Of…

Witt would seem to presume that the modern attitudes of the French or that what “Most have said” has anything to do with ONE ARTIST’S and ONE POET’S Intent 100 years ago,  …. Mno. And in fact contexts of history would suggest Beck’s is the more accurate & informed perspective. He’s given more details in previous segments of his Fox News TV Show And Presumably on Radio too.

- Watch Glenn's (-Hour Long) CPAC Speech Here

1-21-2010 THEORIES VS HISTORY

1-21-2010 THEORIES VS HISTORY

Where is there the pursuit of comparing the 'State of Nature'-Theoretical concepts for society such as "The Federation of Liberty" Vs "The Union of Liberty" arguments with over arching Constitutional Classical Liberalism and its historical real world application's failures in maintaining a standard of freedom?

The State of Nature Theories oft as I've heard them discussed leaves a ludicrous number of details to the imagination.

Whilst the Constitutional History uncomfortably shows that many inherent flaws existing from the beginning (as will occur with any human institution) Not the least of which was slavery, the throwing off of which, in many ways, contributed to the current status quo of economic 'slavery' (or at least indentured servitude).

The status quo of economic slavery is majoritarily accepted as a great evil today (under the names of Socialism, Keynesian Economics, Progressivism, or Big Govt), but Political correctness or ignorance hides the source of it in the vital necessity of throwing off The Unparalleled evil of Slavery in the first place.

So, without slavery (or racial tensions which come with a racially mixed society) what would the united states look like today? Would women's Sufferage have come about? or Prohibition? Would Classic Liberalism have Endured? would it have evolved to current Human Equalities without the cost of economic freedom?

Slavery being in itself a deviation from capitalism (Under which humans cannot qualify as property nor their enslavement be a part of what is DEFINED as "Economic Freedom").

In fact (Capitalism being Absolute Economic Freedom) America has never really been a purely Capitalist society (as some socialists will argue when they advocate their 'Utopianism') However all the various mixed economies and partial freedoms' resulting prosperity for America, Can Be Traced Back to Being Caused by the Greater Economic Freedom!~ And never the limitations.

(Modernally the call is heard against "Deregulation" (as the cause of the recession) yet the madness of it is (not only are corruption and rule breaking to blame making enforcement the issue much like Illegal Immigration) but that they call Instituting the REGULATION of giving loans to the unqualified because of their skin color (practically a racial quota) a "deregulation, (For "Equality")!!
INCONCEIVABLE!~ ludicrous EVEN~

A REAL Deregulation would be to allow interstate insurance competition, which was only prohibited in the first place, by a Misinterpretation of the Constitution, perceiving "Regulation" of interstate comerce (at the time meaning to make regular) with CONTROL of.

Always be on the lookout for vague undefined or not juxtaposed use of language, behind it hypocrisy is lurking.

this has been Asderathos, and remember, I am Not a freaking 'Intellectual'
________________________________________________________________________________________________

1-3-10 THE REPUBLIC BETRAYED

1-3-10 THE REPUBLIC BETRAYED

Republic, Democracy, Democratic Republic, Call it whatever you will, quibble semantics Aaall you want, but get the definition the History, Right! The Founding Fathers Put in place a Republic (res publica = rule of law) wherein the direct democratic (demos = common ppl, kratos = rule IE Rule of the Ppl) election of representatives was purposefullycircumvented because it was known that DIRECT Democracy is merely a Tyranny of the Majority.

And we have fallen into more of a Democratic Tyranny by way of "Representatives" either being Populists without Morals gaming the system Or Highly Moral Revolutionary Fascists seeking to Impose their Collectivist morality on the ppl by far and away ABOVE The Individual and State Sovereignty Described in the 10th Amendment.

Etymology's Place

Popular Understanding of language Trumps Etymological Truth by way of intent (for communication), Except when necessarily applied for understanding history and current Sociology or Politics.

Political Correctness
governmental dictatorship of truth

or rather dictatorship of what is considered to be "true"

regardless of demonstratable facts, reason, or logic

Political Correctness is by example of history, A Governmental Ideological or Organizational Dictatorship of what is "True" particularly within Controversial Issues or actions of that Dictatorial power; with demonization of dissenters by agents of or sympathizers with that Power or its agenda.

Political Correctness, is inherently destructive or derisive of free speech; and is even more effective when a cultural rather than openly legal implementation, pitting ppl against ppl, rather than ideas vs Ideas which with any honesty and reason would necessitous arrive at some measure of Objective Truth.
_____________________________

Take note of the Value of Economic Freedom without which there cannot be Individual Sovereignty; A socialist would say govt handouts create it, but dependence cannot = autonomy; a Purity of which would be anarchy, but restraint only with representative taxation and Rule of Law creates the most Freedom Possible without creating an enslavement to defense of self family and property as is necessitous with anarchy, nor an enslavement to a god-state from which all blessings and all rights must flow with Tyrannical Communism Fascism Socialism or Global Government.
If your goal is freedom in the highest, then logically it is clear what you must and must not advocate lest you be a hypocrite or liar. =)
________________________________________________________________________________________________

11-09-09 LEVITICUS

11-09-09 LEVITICUS

Leviticus 20:13

If a man lies with mankind as he lieth with womankind,

both of them have done what is detestable,

both of them have committed an abomination

They both shall surely be put to death

Leviticus 11-7

And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you
___

What? I'm asking you, and myself, amongst the men of the earth, do Leviticus 20:13 and 11-7 have to do with each other,

Gays are not swine after all

Well, besides chapter, verse falls under that which reason has prohibited in defiance of what one would purport to be "God's Will" But CANNOT be, to a Jeffersonian mind, abiding by Libertine Philosophy

"Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear."

Ppl that ate pork until recently, biblically speaking, DIED FROM IT, (I doubt the gays did much better spreading Disease)

My perspective is that Death was the punishment for nhilistic anti human Risky behaviors destructive to society; However society less close to the bone can abide it, tolerate it, but, but, still should not condone, approve, or accept as normal this behavior.

(In a libertarian society you are a sovereign citizen, but this is my recomendation) ...

I attribute the nuclear family with being the cornerstone of a stable society, all one need do is look at the demographics for a certain ppl who, coincidentally, embraced this deviation, and the consequences

Reverend Manning, of whom I was a fan, was banned from posting new videos to YouTube, I can only conclude (from the video) for calling Gays not Normal

NORMAL: conforming to the standard, or the common type, usual, not abnormal; regular; natural

If Homosexuality ever became “Normal” that would be the end of NATURAL Reproduction

Its a given that the Progressive Politically correct establishment is pushed the envelope beyond tolerance to mandated acceptance (This is why GayMarriage is being pushed by activist judges) but know that I don’t hate Gays, I just find their “Sexuality” Nauseating, and objectively bad for society

If You wouldn’t silence me from saying Leather Fetishists are oogy and bad for society don’t be a hypocrite and advocate it for other sexual deviants. I am a "Libertarian" But that does not prevent me from having opinions as to what is good for society, it only prevents me from enforcing that opinion by force of law or barrel of gun.
________________________________________________________________________________________________